Maasranga TV Instagram Viral Controversy: What Happened to the Account?

Maasranga TV’s official Instagram account has come under scrutiny after manipulated videos featuring Bangladeshi actresses Mehazabien Chowdhury and Pori Moni were posted on the verified profile. The television channel says its account was hacked, while a fact-checking investigation found that the videos had been altered using face-swapping technology.

The incident has sparked debate in Bangladesh about AI-generated misinformation, online harassment and the responsibility of social media users who share fabricated content.

What happened to Maasranga TV’s Instagram account?

The controversy emerged on 13 October 2026, when several objectionable posts appeared on the official Instagram account of Maasranga Television, a Bangladeshi private television broadcaster.

Sponsored · Why this ad?

Grow with Niguro Ads

Simple targeting, honest numbers, pay per view or click. See how Niguro Ads work.

Learn more

According to reports, five pieces of content were uploaded, including two manipulated videos featuring the faces of actresses Mehazabien Chowdhury and Pori Moni. The posts attracted significant attention before they were removed.

Two of the videos reportedly received approximately 155,000 and 147,000 views respectively, alongside hundreds of comments and reactions. Their appearance on a verified television channel’s account caused confusion among followers and quickly became a subject of discussion across social media.

Maasranga TV says Instagram account was hacked

Maasranga Television said its official Instagram account had been compromised and that fabricated images and videos created through the misuse of artificial intelligence had been published without authorisation.

The channel subsequently announced that it had recovered the account and removed the disputed material. It also expressed regret over the incident and urged the public not to share the content or spread unverified claims.

The broadcaster said it had received assistance from law enforcement agencies and relevant authorities during the account recovery process. It also indicated that legal action would be pursued over the incident.

However, questions were raised online about the account’s activity after the disputed posts appeared. A fact-checking investigation by Rumor Scanner examined the sequence of posts and reported that normal-looking news content had continued to appear on the profile.

The investigation noted that some of this material had been published previously. It also said questions surrounding the claimed security breach had not been fully answered in the information available to the investigators. These observations do not, by themselves, establish who was responsible for the posts or disprove the channel’s account of the incident.

Fact-checkers find the viral videos were manipulated

The authenticity of the videos became a central issue as the controversy spread.

Bangladeshi fact-checking organisation Rumor Scanner investigated the footage and reported that the videos were not genuine recordings of the actresses. According to its findings, the material had been edited using face-swapping technology to superimpose the actresses’ faces onto footage of other people.

The finding is significant because the circulation of a video featuring a recognisable face does not establish that the person shown actually participated in the depicted activity.

The manipulated material should therefore not be treated as evidence of wrongdoing by either actress.

Mehazabien Chowdhury speaks out against AI-generated abuse

The controversy took on a wider significance on 15 October, when Mehazabien Chowdhury publicly criticised the creation and circulation of fabricated content using artificial intelligence.

In a Facebook post, the actress challenged the idea that humiliating another person could be justified as entertainment or a way to earn money online.

She also criticised users who knowingly share such material, arguing that the damage extends beyond the person who creates it. Reposting, commenting on and distributing manipulated videos can expose them to much larger audiences.

Mehazabien said the issue was not limited to women or celebrities. Anyone could become a target of fabricated content, while ordinary social media users could contribute to its spread.

Her comments brought renewed attention to the consequences of AI-assisted impersonation and the role of online audiences in amplifying harmful material.

Why the Maasranga TV Instagram viral incident matters

The incident highlights the growing challenges facing media organisations and public figures as AI tools make it easier to produce convincing manipulated images and videos.

For broadcasters, a compromised social media account can quickly become a reputational and security problem. For people whose faces are used in fabricated content, the consequences can include harassment, reputational harm and the loss of control over their own image.

The episode also illustrates how quickly unverified material can spread when it appears on an account that audiences recognise as an established news source.

Digital literacy and responsible sharing are therefore essential. Users should verify the origin of controversial content, avoid treating viral footage as proof and refrain from redistributing material that could harm the people depicted.

What is the latest update on the Maasranga TV Instagram controversy?

As of 16 October 2026, the channel’s reported position is that its Instagram account was hacked, the disputed content was removed and legal action would be pursued. Rumor Scanner’s investigation found that the videos were manipulated, while Mehazabien Chowdhury has publicly condemned the creation and sharing of fabricated AI content.

The available reporting does not establish the identity of whoever uploaded the posts. The circumstances surrounding the reported breach remain a key part of the story.

For anyone searching for “Maasranga TV Instagram viral”, the essential distinction is that the incident concerns manipulated videos published through the broadcaster’s account not verified evidence of the actresses’ real actions.

The case has become part of a broader discussion about online accountability, AI-generated abuse and the risks of treating viral social media content as fact.