The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

The power of seven become a league of one.
2003Fantasy, Action, Thriller1h 50m6.0PG-13
To prevent a world war from breaking out, famous characters from Victorian literature band together to do battle…
Directed by Stephen Norrington 11 Jul 2003 · Asar 27, 2060 BS Germany

Storyline

To prevent a world war from breaking out, famous characters from Victorian literature band together to do battle against a cunning villain.

Facts

  • Release date11 July 2003Asar 27, 2060 BS
  • Runtime1h 50m
  • GenresFantasy, Action, Thriller, Science Fiction
  • DirectorStephen Norrington
  • WritersJames Robinson
  • MusicTrevor Jones
  • LanguageEnglish
  • Budget$78 million
  • Box office$179.3 million
  • Production20th Century Fox, Don Murphy Productions, Mediastream Dritte Film
  • CountriesGermany, United States of America

Keywords

saving the worldsubmarinevenice, italyimmortalitybased on comickenyasteampunksuper powerjekyll and hydeevil plotcaptain nemoallan quatermainsecret lairnautilusunassumingimmortalvictorian eramoriartyinvisible manvampiress (female vampire)appreciative1800s

Explore cinema

#TBT Trailer

Cast 33

Videos 2

Backdrops 26

Posters 24

Where to watch

India

Rent YouTube
Buy YouTube

Streaming data by JustWatch, through TMDB.

Reviews 4

All reviews
  • A Anton2k4 Aug 2012 10/10

    This movie was amazing! Went to see it at the cinema when it first got released back in 2003. For the time the special effects in this movie are mind blowing. A must watch in my opinion.

  • r96sk22 Nov 2020 8/10

    Enjoyed it.

    <em>'The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen'</em> does nothing all that extraordinary but produces a fun time nevertheless. Great cast, fast paced plot and entertaining action. The ending slightly underwhelms, but I still found myself satisfied with it. The special effects are good, it's only "The Nautilus" that looks less than so.

    Sean Connery does carry the film as Quatermain, he's terrific throughout - really enjoyed the way his character carries himself. I liked Tony Curran's Skinner too. I actually rate all the characters to be honest, with Jason Flemyng (Jekyll/Hyde) and Stuart Townsend (Gray) being my picks of the rest.

    Merits a watch, even if Connery didn't remember it all that fondly.

  • CinemaSerf7 Jun 2022 5/10

    .

  • Filipe Manuel Neto2 Jun 2024 3/10

    It works as a piece of entertainment, if we don't think too much about it. But it is, in fact, a film full of problems.

    I just saw this movie right now. I've always heard a lot of bad things about him, but now, after seeing him, I wonder what really went wrong here. The film, to be quite honest, is good enough to meet my expectations (even though they were quite low, I confess), and it seemed to me to be a quite acceptable piece of entertainment, if we don't think about it too much and forget the graphic novel by Alan Moore. It's an adventure film, which easily captivates those who like this style and which gives us good action scenes, with characters we know and which is full of that unmistakable Victorian charm that is still in fashion today. After all, what the hell happened here for this film to be such a resounding failure?

    Let's start by talking a little about the script, which brings together bizarre characters from various literary works from the same period: Tom Sawyer, Alain Quartermain, Captain Nemo, Dr. Jeckill/Mr. Hyde, Mrs. Mina Harker, the Invisible Man (who for rights reasons had to change his name in this film), Dorian Gray and James Moriarty, to name a few. Literature connoisseurs have already realized that the amalgamation of different characters from different books and authors has a lot of potential, it could create a kind of “19th century Avengers”. The problem is that the potential was lost when the screenwriters ignored the stories of these characters and created “action figures” with the same name and some similarity. There is mutual distrust, attempts to bring some depth to the film, but in general, the story is shallow and bloated.

    Throughout the film, we observe that there is no concern about precisely recreating the Victorian environment. In fact, the film is a kind of alternative history where we even see the use of technologies that only appeared long after 1900, such as sonar, radar and automobiles with automatic gearboxes. This “salad” increases the level of special and visual effects and also the creative breadth of the producers, but I don't know to what extent the public accepted it. In addition to these problems, we still have logic holes in the plot and dialogues that couldn't be more cheesy and poorly written.

    Directed by Stephen Norrington, the film seems to have had no director at the helm: we can see

More like this

TMDB χ Niguro, Credits to all contributors.